Early morning musings. Assuming I have done some math
correctly: There are approximately 6,500 households in Bay Village. 1,200 or
roughly 18.5% received the random Master Plan survey. The expectation is 30% of
those 1,200 will return the surveys. This estimate means 360 opinions will be
tallied. If that projection is accurate, then only 5.5 % of 6,500 households
will have input. I believe there will be a better response than 30%. Residents
are eager to participate. Nonetheless…
Imagine if 6,500 houses could have received the survey –
with an expected 30% return, then 1,950 households would have had a voice. Even
on the low end of expectations with typical survey responses of 14% - that
could have been 910 opinions versus 360. For the 1999 survey 50% of the
recipients responded. Imagine 50% of 6,500 households giving input.
I asked the county planner if it wouldn’t be better to use
an online survey as some residents had suggested so the city and county could
have received greater feedback. The response: “We worked with the City of Bay
Village to devise a survey method that would be both useful and
cost-effective--and that method was a random sample of printed surveys. We have
undertaken online surveys in the past; however, the price of designing and
distributing both an online and in-print survey precluded it in this case. This
is in addition to inherent problems of an online survey which include that we
cannot ensure that online survey-takers are Bay Village residents, we cannot
ensure that people will not take the survey multiple times, and many people do
not have access to the internet. In past surveys, we have found that residents
prefer paper to electronic surveys 2 to 1. Due to the scope and budget of the
project, we can only send out surveys to the random sample of population.”
(November 10, 2015)
No comments:
Post a Comment