Monday, May 4, 2015

4/27/15 Sewer Reconnection Meeting

Additional information taken from the draft of the 4/27 meeting. RE: Discussion CW money and District 11 sewer reconnection.

A resident “…asked Mayor Sutherland if the announcement she made earlier in the meeting regarding money from Cleveland Water Department was for water for the different cities. …asked if the City of Bay Village could have gone in for that to get something that is going to offset this possible $5,000 per house charge to correct the sewer connection.”

“Mayor Sutherland answered that we could have, however Council decided to table the issue.
Mr. Koomar addressed the Mayor stating that she is talking about sanitary lines versus water. Mr. Vincent added that the money spoken of has nothing to do with the sanitary disconnection issue. Mayor Sutherland replied that it does because it could be used to leverage the project. If we are going to be opening a trench we might as well replace the water lines.


Mr. Koomar addressed Director of Public Service Thomas stating that he may want to correct the Mayor that this is all on private property.”

April 2015 Notes

April 27

Upsetting news is hitting Bay residents week after week. At the end of last week the first round of residents that will be required to reconnect their sewers have received notices, with the promise of an official letter to follow.

The upset comes because the repair cost is the homeowner’s responsibility. We are talking thousands of dollars. As one resident writes “The city is mandating a time frame from the time you're notified to complete the repairs. I believe that time frame is 12 months. If not completed by then they plan on charging you $50 per month until it is corrected. Again, the city sat on this for years and did nothing. Why don't homeowners have years to correct the city's mistakes?”

Additionally, a resident that had his basement waterproofed about 6 years ago was told he was in compliance by one of our inspectors. He had the permits, used a reputable and qualified contractor and had the final inspection all for naught.

Other residents are expressing the frustration that they have called the city multiple times and were given days they would be visited but no one has come out to visit.

April 28

Petulant. I tried to come up with a different word to describe the behavior at last night’s meeting but this word lingers. The meeting brought several residents from the Bruce, Douglas, Russell area that received the letters regarding sewer upgrades. Prior to the audience session of the meeting, during the Mayor’s announcements, harboring resentment, she spoke “I know you think I forgot about this” and proceeded to report on the $14 million that Cleveland Water distributed to competing cities for replacement of small broken pipes.

The first audience member to speak took that to heart. Hearing that council unanimously turned down the agreement, and thereby the money that she felt could have helped their neighborhood, she questioned it. Well, that money couldn’t have and probably wouldn’t have helped them, but the Mayor saw an opportunity to get sentiment on her side and ran with it. It was a jaw dropping moment for those of us that knew the backstory. You have a room with many that are attending their first meeting and through no fault of their own do not know what to believe. Hearing this added something else for them to be frustrated about. The audience questioned why council would just “table the matter” as the Mayor put it. They did not realize what work had gone into it and that it was not a simple or easy matter. When council intervened over the Mayor’s distortion and turned to Scott Thomas (Service Director) for clarity and a better explanation of the situation – let’s just say – the Mayor is his boss and he too supplied some non-answers to the question at hand.

The feeling was left dangling over these residents that they missed out on money. I left the meeting and made a point to talk to the woman that still couldn’t understand why council did that. I wanted her and the other residents to realize it was not entirely the way the Mayor portrayed it. I did not have any meeting notes with me or this quote from a Plain Dealer article “…agreement (with Cleveland Water) would provide a way to swap out 100-year-old pipes along Sunset Drive for modern plumbing, and allow Bay Village to apply twice a year for more cash to replace other antiquated pipes. Cleveland Water sweetened the deal with $1.2 million for the Sunset pipes.”

As I was leaving, the Mayor also came outside and found the group and began talking with them. I had to chuckle to myself this morning – who are they going to listen to? Some woman they don’t even know or the Mayor that told them what they wanted to hear?

Last night’s behavior was uncalled for and displayed a lack of integrity. I don’t always agree with Council, but I will say they certainly did not deserve that manipulation.

If you live in the area of Russell, Douglas and Bruce, the ordinance to repair the sewer has not passed yet. You still have time to learn and be heard. If you don’t live in that area, it is beneficial for you to follow what is happening. You may be faced with this issue someday.

April 29

In light of the confusion about Improvement Target Areas and the dye testing and sewer reconnection, one suggestion has been to obtain a copy of your property file. These are kept at the Safebuilt office at City Hall. You do not have to make a public records request for this. You can show up, but if they are busy you will have to go back. It might be a good idea to call ahead. Should you request it ask for everything in it. If you want copies, they are at your expense.

One resident had stated that her house was dye tested and was told it was fine, but has since received a notice that she had to comply with the sewer reconnection. This is just one example of why it is important to know what is in your file.

April 29

A few notes from the audience session at the 4/27 meeting: Ordinance Chapter 916 – Foundation Drain Disconnection.

The main body of the Clean Water Act was passed in 1972. The City of Bay Village received a letter in 2009 from the EPA advising what needed to be done to come into compliance. A resident asked that this letter be posted on the City website. When residents asked why this had been sat on for years the Mayor stated they were working the improvements on the public right of ways according to EPA. She kept stating this was EPA mandated but did not ease the frustration for those that felt she waited too long to act on this for the residents behalf. They feel pressure to comply or be charged $50 a month if they don’t comply within a year of receiving notice. The fee will go into the City sewer fund. The Mayor said the money would go to help residents pay for compliance. I’m not sure how that would work. It was unclear if the EPA would fine the City.

Bay is under orders from the EPA to make significant progress in the Bruce-Russell-Douglas area by 2016.

The sewer improvement on private property was discussed at length during a Town Hall in November 2014.

One homeowner said they would prefer to see a letter from the EPA to the households.

The new ordinance would only apply to district 11. Different districts – different ordinances.

This ordinance calls for sump pumps to be installed. Several members of the audience expressed that sump pumps are a “horrible idea”.

Scott Thomas (Service Director) cited this work was recently done in Westlake and all went well.

Mr. Thomas said repairs should be in the vicinity of $1,500 to $2,000. While several in the audience expressed they had obtained estimates that were at least double and well over that amount. Their estimates did not even include sump pumps or re-landscaping. *There was also discussion about requiring residents to add a generator.

Some homeowners have only been in the house for a couple of years and felt that new homeowners should have been made aware of this when buying.

No, your home can not be grandfathered in.

A resident questioned if the City could get one plumber willing to give a discount to the group.

Several residents said they understood the need for compliance but wanted to continue the discussion as they have more questions and would like to have input.


Passing of 916 is currently on hold.

March 2015 Notes - Cleveland Water Agreement

March 13

The Cleveland Water Agreement discussion continued.  From Councilman Tom Henderson : "Council and the Mayor have been considering a proposal to transfer ownership of our water lines from Bay Village to Cleveland Water. It’s a complex issue, but my top concern is that Bay Village currently controls when the aging water lines under our streets are replaced. If we transfer ownership of our lines to Cleveland Water, they will decide when our water lines need to be replaced. Accepting this proposal would also limit our options regarding water suppliers in the future as the region’s water infrastructure evolves. What do you think?"

March 27

"We just think council made a huge mistake, and unfortunately the taxpayers are going to have pay for it," Sutherland said.

March 28

Starting page 5 - some of the months long discussions on the Cleveland Water Agreement are attached in the Council notes. The Mayor mentioned that this had been discussed for 5 months – but now since the newspapers got wind of it ‘for the sake of transparency’ they would not convene to executive session – which allows no audience, but will discuss in public. 5 months and suddenly it’s decided to be transparent?



January 2015 Notes

January 7

Planning Commission Meeting: There is a 3rd party reviewing Chapter 1158, attached resident housing. Paying this 3rd party was approved by Council. I asked what this company was going to do that the commissions could not do and how much we are paying for this. The company, LSL Planning, will be reviewing and filling in the blanks - such as green space and will work to assure the language is correct to be adopted. Exact figures could not be recalled but the price is around $1,500. It should be noted this company is a subsidiary of Safebuilt.

The Mayor walked us through the Planning Commission process she and several department heads revised this fall. It was stated no ordinances have to be changed or are affected by this new procedure, which is now official. Some still question that point.

The new Mayor’s Representative on the Planning Commission was introduced. Andrew Dzienny. He had been a member of the commission in the past. Karen Leiske nominated Mark Barbour for the position of Chairman for the Planning Commission. Mr. Dzienny nominated himself. After a 4 to 2 vote, Mr. Barbour will be Chair and Mr. Dzienny will be Vice Chair.

Plans for the 9 lots for new homes on Crestview Drive were approved.

Bay Diner will not be going into the Consignment Shop location. The owners have decided to move into the vacant old Napa Auto Parts store. Parking issues were cited as the reason.

January 15


5 area Mayors attended a meeting in Columbus with the ODNR Friday while Mayor Sutherland cited weather as the reason she did not attend. At the Jan. 5 committee meeting she did say she didn’t think the State’s position had changed. I will be interested to see what this spring brings in terms of deer population.

Saturday, May 2, 2015

Out of Order

My apologies. I have neglected my blog. I confess, I post more information on the facebook link with the same name. I will now play catch up for you. I promise going forward that whatever I post on facebook, I will also post here on the same day. I do realize not all of you use facebook. If you do, there is more discussion there than on the posts here. 

So stay with me while I dredge up some old news.

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Perspective

I am stunned by some comments on different FB threads about this ITA issue; people are missing the point, not understanding the dismay,  not attending meetings, skimming what they are reading. Just as “facts are facts” - attitude is attitude.  Some are taking the attitude that if you can’t fix it get out of town, or if you want diversity, move. Really? Where did you all come from? Never fell on a hard time? Never had a relative on a fixed income? Don’t know any elderly or poor people? Drive around judging those less fortunate? There are however a number of people I talked to that expressed the opposite feeling and genuine concern for those that are having difficulty maintaining.

That question was raised last night “What does the city have in place to help those that simply cannot afford to do these repairs?” The answer is absolutely nothing. The responses from the Mayor were – “The city is limited in what they can do” “…may be investigating that particular aspect down the road” “…may look at grants” Why the wait? Apparently the time is now!  This didn’t happen overnight – there has been ample time for the city to be proactive.

Many want to see better options for assistance. We are a small community – can’t be compared to any other neighboring city. Since the housing stock is priority, residents must also be. Residents don’t get our small town feel when it comes to the city administration and hesitate to turn to the city. Many residents feel their concerns fall on deaf ears. Two individuals pointed out last night that if there is difficulty maintaining to begin with then they may not be able to get a loan in the first place, or have trouble paying that back.


It’s not as black and white as it is being made out to be.  I am sure there are some that really don’t care and are disrespectful to the neighbors by their lack of maintenance and attention to property, but don’t act like that is everyone that received a notice. Talk to a variety of people, attend the meetings, and be willing to look at it from each individual point of view.

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Home Improvement Town Hall April 20, 2015


If you missed tonight's meeting you missed a lot. Lots of "I didn't say that" "that's not what I said" was the Mayor's response to the backlash she received from concerned residents of Ward 1.  The resident that was offended during last Monday's presentation (see April 16 post) of "Target Improvement Areas" circulated a flyer in her immediate neighborhood. Attendance tonight was over 100 people. Many from the east side area that was heavily targeted. And they were mad. The Mayor kept stating that this came from the county and "facts are facts".

Fact is that last Monday the Mayor gave the presentation, not the county. There was no realization on her part that by the way she set it up and the terminology she used, she offended a great many residents. I don't think she ever got the point.

Many from the audience came up to the "anonymous" author of the flyer to tell her they fully supported "anonymous" - who was not really anonymous especially after the Mayor stated that it was "unfortunate that Mrs.... chose to do that" Anonymous regrets not signing the flyer but she never intended to be anonymous since she spoke to most of those residents face to face.