Monday, October 28, 2013

Charter Review - Question 2

Question 2.) Is it self-serving? Is it to limit the participation and challenge of Mayoral candidates? Was this an appropriate time to introduce the idea given the chronic discussion and outsourcing or downsizing due to budget cuts? Is it groundwork for the direction the Mayor wants to go in?

3-19-12 Charter Review meeting opens the door to forms of government. A City Charter allows flexibility to choose novel types of government structures. Mayor Sutherland notes that there are City Managers in and around the state. My research shows there are 4 City Managers in Cuyahoga County out of 57 cities. None from our neighboring west shore communities. The Mayor and Mr. Cruse who both know City Mangers state that they will invite them to come in and speak to the commission.

This administration has steadfastly stated its positive results and accomplishments under the current Mayor and Council form of government. Yet the feedback in the room seems interested, positive regarding this idea.

4-2-12 meeting, the Mayor gives a Power Point presentation defining a City Manager form of government. Including:
“City Managers are compensated on a contractual basis. The average length of stay is five years. It is very competitive and the urban/suburban compensation ranges from $120,000 to $180,000 annually, plus benefits. In some of the very rural communities it is more likely that it will be in the $75,000 to $100,000 range"

In the end, the current form of government was not changed. For now. I have more questions.


No comments:

Post a Comment